<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.andremolnar.com">
<channel>
 <title>Andre Molnar 2.0 - Politically Incorrect</title>
 <link>http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/4/0</link>
 <description>Stuff that people might not like to hear - but may very well be the truth.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Belinda Stronach for PM?</title>
 <link>http://www.andremolnar.com/node/79</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Martin has said he will not be leading the Liberals in the next election.  This of course means that there will be a Liberal convention to choose a new leader of the party.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Names like Brian Tobin have already come up, but I&#039;m kind of hoping for Belinda Stronach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Socially progressive and fiscally conservative, Stronach would have a good chance of leading the party to victory.  And she&#039;s not hard to look at.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean come on Canada, wouldn&#039;t you want to be known as the country with the hottest leader in the free world?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;andre&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/4">Politically Incorrect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/3">Politics</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:15:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Connection between Stephen Harper and Saddam Hussein</title>
 <link>http://www.andremolnar.com/node/68</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ad words can be funny some times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Saddam Hussein and Stephen Harper both showed up on my main page ad words today.  Coincidence?  Perhaps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, it does make you wonder what algorithm connected a) the content on my site to b) Saddam Hussein and c) Stephen Harper - and what made it think that people interested in b) would also be interested in c).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a) to c) I can understand.  I recently blogged about how supporters  of President Bush would love to see Stephen Harper be the next Prime Minister of Canada.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;b) to c) I can maybe understand.  Both Saddam Hussein and Stephen Harper are idiots.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, a) to b) makes not sense at all.  UNLESS - Since I&#039;ve blogged about Stephen Harper - President Bush - and Tucker Carleson - Ad Sense connected the dots... if people are interested in these 3 idiots they must be intersted in a fourth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;andre&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/4">Politically Incorrect</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:30:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tucker Carlson has a retarded world view.</title>
 <link>http://www.andremolnar.com/node/65</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Tucker Carlson has taken to calling Canadians the retarded cousins of Americans &quot;You know, he&#039;s nice but you don&#039;t take him seriously. That&#039;s Canada.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Carlson - Pro Bush - Anti Canada.  Sounds like Stephen Harper ;-).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;andre&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/4">Politically Incorrect</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:27:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Its that time again</title>
 <link>http://www.andremolnar.com/node/40</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, its that time again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No - not my period.  (men don&#039;t actually get those).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Its the time of the month when I bitch about how stupid internet explorer is and how hopeless it is to design anything using stylesheets if IE is just not going to follow the rules.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me rephrase that.  Its never hopeless to design using stylesheets - but it is hopeless to expect IE to render them correctly - especially not in &#039;strict&#039; mode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thats all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But... apparently there is an IE7beta coming out this summer.  They had better hurry up.  Its already august.  Still, one of the microsoft bloggers has said &quot;standards compliance is not as important as backwards compatibility.&quot;  In other words - we&#039;d rather try and render poorly authored websites so they look nearly fine - rather than render perfectly authored websites  the way they should be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So - here it is my monthy fuck you IE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FUCK YOU IE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;andre&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/8">Geeky</category>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/4">Politically Incorrect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/10">Professional</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:47:30 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Warren Kinsella</title>
 <link>http://www.andremolnar.com/node/13</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warrenkinsella.com/index.htm&quot; title=&quot;Warren Kinsella&quot;&gt;Warren Kinsella&lt;/a&gt; is an interesting cat.  I like cats, but I&#039;m also deathly alergic to them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here you have a 70&#039;s punk rocker cum journalist cum lawyer cum political advisor cum journalist cum... I don&#039;t know what he is now... but anyone that&#039;s been involved in all the arenas this guy has can&#039;t help but be interesting.  (How many people with his resume still take time out to review indie bands of past and present).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, just cause he&#039;s interesting doesn&#039;t mean that he&#039;s without flaws.  He&#039;s an agressive, loud, in your face, take no prisoners kind of guy... and if you read what he has to say about himself I don&#039;t think he would deny any of that... and may, in fact, take pride in those charactistics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today he wrote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;# Canwest&#039;s Grant Robertson has a piece in the Post today detailing the Martinette&#039;s outrage that people are saying mean things about them: &quot;Liberal staffers have assembled a list of what the government considers &quot;slanderous allegations&quot; and violations of parliamentary rules made by the opposition over the past three months. The list points a finger at 28 opposition MPs over the course of 17 days in the House -- including 19 Tories and nine Bloc members.&quot; What a load of crap. It&#039;s okay for them to slander people willy-nilly and violate Parliamentary privilege (cf. Ralph The Mouth Goodale calling Yours Truly &quot;poison&quot; in the House of Commons), but they shriek like banshees when someone does it to them. Sucky babies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/4">Politically Incorrect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.andremolnar.com/taxonomy/term/3">Politics</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 03:57:56 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
